Recommender systems researcher advancing generative recommendation with semantic IDs and RL-based credit assignment
2
papers here
0
reviewed by Evolve
0
first-author
0
corresponding
—
works · OpenAlex
4
h-index · OpenAlex
Bibliometric figures come from OpenAlex (2026-09-27) and cover the author's entire public record, not just the papers listed here. Reproducibility signal comes from Evolve's own reviews.
Research profile
Output—
No output score yet: the snapshot lacks a reliable total-publication count attributable to this identity. This axis would measure cumulative publication volume, venue distribution, and how the output trajectory develops over time.
Impact—
No impact score yet: citation evidence for this identity is too thin to benchmark (h-index 4, i10-index 2 are reported but very small). This axis would measure citation-based influence, including aggregate citations and field-normalized impact.
Focus—
No focus score yet: topical labels are scattered across recommender systems, graph neural networks, topic modeling, renewable energy, and cyclone separators, blocking a coherent concentration measure. This axis would measure topical concentration of the research agenda.
Collaboration41/100
Collaboration scores 41 out of 100. The OpenAlex record lists 7 distinct coauthors, and the Evolve catalog shows a recurring group: Mengdan Zhu, Yufan Zhao, Sophie Di, Yao Zhao, Yulan Yan, Sridhar Iyer, and Liang Zhao. Both reviewed 2026 papers place Tao Di in a middle author position without corresponding status, consistent with specialist-contributor roles inside small teams rather than solo or senior-lead authorship.
Activity52/100
Activity scores 52 out of 100. The snapshot reports 5 works in the last three years, and year-by-year counts show a steady recent cadence: one to two works in most years from 2019 through 2024, a peak of 3 in 2025, and 1 in 2026. Sparse earlier entries (2005, 2016) may reflect indexing gaps or name ambiguity rather than a continuous publishing history.
Reproducibility—
No reproducibility score yet: code and data release metrics are absent from the snapshot. This axis would measure artifact availability and verification readiness; Evolve's qualitative review tagged both 2026 papers as medium repro-readiness.
Research summary
Tao Di is a recommender-systems researcher whose recent work centers on generative recommendation built on semantic IDs. This profile is name-resolved from public OpenAlex bibliographic data; no institutional affiliation or ORCID was available, so identity confidence is limited. The Evolve catalog reviews two 2026 arXiv preprints, both with middle author positions and no corresponding role: 'Learning Better Reasoning for Generative Recommendation with Semantic IDs' (Evo-Rec, combining best-of-n rejection-sampling SFT with NDCG-reward GRPO) and 'From Interests to Semantic IDs' (retrieval-grounded credit assignment for semantic-ID recommendation). Evolve judged both technically solid on ablations while flagging missing seed variance, second-hand baselines, and untested reward leakage. The OpenAlex snapshot reports an h-index of 4, an i10-index of 2, five works in the last three years, and seven distinct coauthors. Topic assignments concentrate on recommender systems (5 works), advanced graph neural networks (4), and topic modeling (3), with thinner clusters in hybrid renewable energy and cyclone separators — a spread that hints at possible homonym conflation in the index. Radar scoring puts activity at 52/100 and collaboration at 41/100, while output, impact, focus, and reproducibility lack sufficient data to score.
Collaboration pattern
The collaboration score is 41/100, based on 7 distinct coauthors in the OpenAlex record. A recurring group — Mengdan Zhu, Yufan Zhao, Sophie Di, Yao Zhao, Yulan Yan, Sridhar Iyer, and Liang Zhao — anchors the network. In both reviewed 2026 papers Tao Di appears in a middle author position without corresponding status, indicating a contributor role within team projects rather than solo or senior-lead authorship.
Research keywords
Highlights
Evo-Rec: reasoning-trained generative recommendation with semantic IDs
Retrieval-grounded credit assignment for semantic-ID recommendation
Steady recent output with a 2025 peak
The OpenAlex snapshot credits 5 works over the last three years, including a peak of 3 indexed works in 2025, supporting an activity score of 52/100.
Timeline
- 2005Earliest record in the OpenAlex snapshot: one indexed work, long before the current recommender-systems research line.
- 2019Indexed output resumes at a low but steady cadence: one work in 2019, then one to two works in most years through 2024.
- 2021Counts reach 2 works in both 2020 and 2021, the first sustained stretch of the recent publishing phase.
- 2025Most productive indexed year in the snapshot, with 3 works — the recent peak behind the 52/100 activity score.
- 2026Two arXiv preprints on generative recommendation with semantic IDs enter the Evolve catalog, both reviewed with middle author positions and no corresponding role.
Papers in the Evolve catalog
Frequent co-authors
About this profile
This profile is AI-structured by Evolve.Pub from public bibliographic data (OpenAlex) and Evolve's own paper reviews. It is not written or endorsed by the researcher unless the profile is claimed. Radar dimensions are computed from real bibliometrics with fixed formulas — raw figures are shown alongside; missing dimensions mean insufficient data, never zero. Errors? Claim the profile to correct or hide it.
- Bibliometrics (h-index 4, i10-index 2, counts by year, topics) come from a name-resolved OpenAlex profile; no ORCID or institutional affiliation was available to confirm identity.
- The topic spread — recommender systems and graph neural networks alongside hybrid renewable energy systems and cyclone separators — suggests possible homonym conflation in the underlying index.
- Both reviewed papers are 2026 arXiv preprints with middle author positions and no corresponding-author role; no peer-reviewed venue or full author list was provided.
- Output, impact, focus, and reproducibility axes are unscored because the underlying data is insufficient; collaboration (41) and activity (52) are the only radar scores available.
