LLM Evaluation Methodology Researcher Auditing Proxy Validity and Score Corrections · Kookmin University
2
papers here
2
reviewed by Evolve
0
first-author
0
corresponding
—
works · OpenAlex
—
h-index · OpenAlex
Bibliometric figures come from OpenAlex (2026-10-08) and cover the author's entire public record, not just the papers listed here. Reproducibility signal comes from Evolve's own reviews.
Research profile
Output—
Not yet scored: publication-volume data is insufficient in the current snapshot. This axis would measure total and per-year output, venue types, and authorship positions across the researcher's full bibliographic record.
Impact—
Not yet scored: no citation counts, h-index, or adoption signals are available in the data. This axis would measure citations and downstream uptake of the two reviewed preprints in LLM evaluation practice.
Focus0/100
The focus dimension scores 0 because the field distribution is an even 0.5/0.5 split between 'machine learning (LLM evaluation methodology)' and 'machine learning evaluation methodology / NLP' — two nearly synonymous labels. At this labeling resolution the record looks undifferentiated, but topically the work concentrates tightly on evaluation-methodology auditing rather than spanning genuinely unrelated fields.
Collaboration28/100
The collaboration dimension scores 28 from a compact footprint: 3 distinct coauthors appear in the bibliometric record. Daein Weon recurs as the key partner, co-authoring both 2026 catalog papers, on which Dong Ho Kang takes the last author position (non-corresponding). The pattern suggests a small, stable two-person core rather than a broad cross-institutional network.
Activity—
Not yet scored: the snapshot lacks multi-year publication frequency data. This axis would measure output cadence over time — preprints or papers per year — to indicate whether research tempo is sustained.
Reproducibility100/100
Reproducibility scores 100 (reproMean 100 across 2 scored papers), the strongest signal in this profile. Both catalog papers carry 'high' reproducibility readiness. Evolve verdicts attribute this to careful scoping and honest self-limitation: diagnostic scores on one model pair in the proxy-audit paper, and a synthetic-only demonstration of residualization harm in the second.
Research summary
Dong Ho Kang is a researcher at Kookmin University working in machine learning evaluation methodology, with a concentration on large language model (LLM) evaluation. The profile is built from two 2026 arXiv preprints in the Evolve catalog, on both of which Kang holds the last author position. The first, 'Auditing Proxy-Based Validation Across Text Spans', audits proxy-based validation across text spans and shows that same-span proxy agreement can amount to mere surface containment — a construct-validity concern relevant to LLM-as-a-judge, model routing, and refusal detection; Evolve credits the careful method while noting evidence is limited to diagnostic scores on one model pair. The second, 'When Residualization Helps an Audit', argues that post-hoc residualization of LLM evaluation scores functions as an audit diagnostic rather than a repair, documenting format effects and slice gains alongside their limits. The field distribution is an even 0.5/0.5 split between LLM evaluation methodology and ML evaluation methodology/NLP. Both papers are rated high for reproducibility readiness, with a reproducibility mean of 100 across 2 scored papers. Collaboration is compact — 3 distinct coauthors, with Daein Weon recurring as the key partner. Output, impact, and activity metrics are not yet available and are intentionally not scored.
Collaboration pattern
Dong Ho Kang's recorded collaboration footprint is compact: 3 distinct coauthors, with Daein Weon as the recurring partner on both 2026 catalog papers. On each paper Kang takes the last author position without corresponding-author designation, a role consistent with a senior contributor in a small two-person core team. The collaboration dimension score of 28 reflects this narrow but stable pattern; no large cross-institutional network appears in the data.
Research keywords
Highlights
Proxy Agreement Across Text Spans Can Be Mere Surface Containment
Residualization of LLM Eval Scores Is an Audit Diagnostic, Not a Repair
High Reproducibility Readiness Across Both Papers
Both catalogued papers carry 'high' reproducibility readiness, yielding a reproducibility mean of 100 across 2 scored papers — the strongest quantitative signal in this profile, reflecting carefully scoped methods and explicit self-stated evidence limits.
Timeline
- 2026First catalogued arXiv preprint appears: 'Auditing Proxy-Based Validation Across Text Spans', with Dong Ho Kang in the last-author position.
- 2026Second arXiv preprint, 'When Residualization Helps an Audit: Format Effects, Slice Gains, and Their Limits', argues residualization is an audit diagnostic rather than a repair.
- 2026Both 2026 papers receive 'high' reproducibility readiness ratings (reproMean 100 across 2 papers), anchoring the year's output in LLM evaluation methodology.
Papers in the Evolve catalog
Frequent co-authors
About this profile
This profile is AI-structured by Evolve.Pub from public bibliographic data (OpenAlex) and Evolve's own paper reviews. It is not written or endorsed by the researcher unless the profile is claimed. Radar dimensions are computed from real bibliometrics with fixed formulas — raw figures are shown alongside; missing dimensions mean insufficient data, never zero. Errors? Claim the profile to correct or hide it.
- Dimension scores are computed from public bibliometric data; the output, impact, and activity axes lack sufficient underlying data and are intentionally not scored.
- The profile rests on 2 arXiv preprints (2026) in the Evolve catalog; no peer-reviewed venue, citation, or h-index data is included.
- Both reviewed papers carry Evolve-noted evidence limits: diagnostic scores on one model pair (proxy audit) and synthetic-only demonstrations (residualization).
- Identity is resolved from public bibliographic data via ORCID 0009-0003-8485-3691; the name Dong Ho Kang may not be unique.
